Legal Opinion
DeFina v. Scott
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
The parties, once engaged, sue and countersue on issues which arise from the termination of their engagement. The disputes concern the wedding preparation expenses, the engagement ring, third-party gifts and the premarital transfer of a one-half interest in the real property which was to be the *76marital abode.1 The distinguishing feature of this case — that both parties were well-established professional adults who embarked upon preparations for a formal wedding paid for from their own funds, primarily acting upon clear plans regarding their engagement…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of BedfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kennedy v. McKesson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bloomfield v. BloomfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trombley v. SorrelleWatertown City Court · 2004