Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1993No. 2-91-192-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Harold Maurice Richardson appeals his conviction for voluntary manslaughter. TexJPenal Code Ann. § 19.04 (Vernon 1989). Following a jury trial, the court assessed punishment at ten years confinement, probated for ten years.

We affirm.

In his first point of error, Richardson complains the trial court improperly allowed the State to interject evidence of his character at the guili/innocence phase of trial. In point two, Richardson contends he is entitled to a new trial because the State’s and the defense’s closing arguments are not part of the record on appeal.

During the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Werner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Walthall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Dockery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Amis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Joe Derek Carr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Joe Derek Carr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API