Legal Opinion

State v. Mollica

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 16, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

114 N.J. 329 (1989)

554 A.2d 1315

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

PRIMO V. MOLLICA AND AUGUSTINE FERRONE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 2, 1988.

Decided March 16, 1989.

Larry R. Etzweiler, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey).

Stephen W. Kirsch, argued the cause for respondent Augustine Ferrone (Francis J. Hartman, attorney; Stephen W. Kirsch and Charles H. Nugent, Jr., on the briefs).

B. Dennis O'Connor submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of respondent Primo V. Mollica.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API