Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State of Iowa v. Hillary Lee Tyler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 30, 2015No. 13–0588Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWaterman, Justice

I respectfully concur in part IV and dissent from part III of the majority opinion. The majority correctly concludes the district court properly denied Tyler’s motion to suppress her confessions that she drowned her baby in the bathtub. Yet, the majority erroneously concludes the district court abused its discretion by allowing the medical examiner to testify as to the cause and manner of death because he relied on the same voluntary confessions the jury was allowed to hear. Medical experts testifying in our courts routinely rely on patient histories. Medical examiners such as Dr. Thompson…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Richard Walker v. Soo Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. State of Iowa v. Patrick Michael DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API