Legal Opinion

David Kester v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2017No. 16-15774Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

David A. Kester (“Kester”) filed a putative class action suit alleging that Citi-Mortgage and CR Title (“Defendants”) knowingly caused the recording of invalid property documents in violation of Ariz. Rev. Stat. (“A.R.S.”)§ 33-420(A). The district court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand.

1. Kester has standing to bring this action, despite the fact that A.R.S. § 33-411(C) provides that “an instrument affecting real property containing any defect, omission or informality in the certificate of acknowledgment and which has been recorded for longer than one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Washington Environmental Counc v. Theodore SturdevantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Robinson v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. State v. Mabery Ranch, Co., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API