Legal Opinion

Aherns v. Drew

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 24, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover of the defendants damages for deficiency of the acreage in certain premises he bought of the defendants Drew. The complaint sets out the descriptive clause of the deed, which stated the land to be “in quantity fifteen acres more or less,” and then bounded it southerly upon a highway and elsewhere upon the lands of others; it then recites the general covenants of the deed, which are those usually found in warranty deeds, and alleges that instead of there being the quantity stated in the deed there was in fact but eight and two tenths acres. The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thayer v. . FintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Snow v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1793
  3. Brassell v. FiskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Doyle v. MellenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API