Legal Opinion

Heasley v. KSM Energy, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

KSM Energy, Inc. (“KSM”), a Pennsylvania Corporation, EXCO Appalachia, Inc. (“EXCO”), a Delaware Corporation, and their predecessors in title, successors and assigns and all other persons claiming any interest in the property described in this action, appeal from the Order of the trial court entering judgment on the pleadings in favor of Larry D. Heasley (“Heasley”). We affirm.

In its Opinion, the trial court summarized the factual and procedural history of the instant appeal as follows:

[Heasley] filed a complaint asking the [trial court] to find that two gas and oil…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Willison v. Consolidation Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Cassell v. CrothersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Clark v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allison, D. v. Rice Drilling B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Barton, E. v. Graham, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Douglas Equipment v. EQT Production CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Frye, P. v. Penn View Exploration, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Miller, M. v. Adams Outdoor AdvertisingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API