Legal Opinion
Howard v. Van Gieson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal by the plaintiff, Robert S. Howard, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
This action was brought to recover the sum of $1,650, the amount •of a promissory note made by one Walter B. Starbird, and alleged to have been indorsed by the defendant. The note read as follows:
“$1650.00/100. New York, JaEy 5th, L898.
“ On or before April 5th, 1898, after date, I promise to pay to the order of R. S. Howard, Sixteen Hundred and Fifty Dollars, at office Starbird Manf’g Co., No. 1133 Broadway, N. Y., Value received, with interest at 6$ from date.
“ No. 3. Due Apr. 5th, ’98.
“ W. B. STARBIRD.”
The complaint alleged that Starbird delivered the note to Van Gieson, who,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coulter v. . RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Phelps v. . VischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Cuming v. RoderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haddock, Blanchard Co. v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Kohn v. Consolidated Butter & Egg Co.New York Supreme Court · 1900
- Century Bank v. BreitbartCity of New York Municipal Court · 1915
- Century Bank v. BreitbartNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- Howard v. Bank of the MetropolisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905