Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mark Partnow, J.
Defendants Reicon Group LLC and Reinauer Transportation Companies, L.P move for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing all causes of action against them.
On April 17, 2001, plaintiff was allegedly employed as a dock builder by Reicon, a marine construction contractor, and was working as a dive tender aboard the CB Bergen, a stationary work barge owned by Reinauer, in connection with a pier demolition/rehabilitation contract Reicon was performing for the City of New York at the Department of Sanitation Marine Transfer Station located at 31st Avenue…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher v. HalliburtonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
- Durando v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Durando v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sweeney v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2004