Legal Opinion

Lanclos v. Coastal Food, LLC.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 2004No. 04-222PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hAMY, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation matter, the employee-claimant contested the termination of his indemnity benefits and also sought attorney’s fees and penalties, alleging that the employer had improperly calculated his average weekly wage and the corresponding weekly indemnification rate; had untimely paid weekly indemnity and medical benefits; had untimely approved medical benefits; had failed to approve his choice of physician; and had failed to timely provide a copy of a second medical opinion examination performed at the employer’s request. The employer, in turn, argued that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. Authement v. Shappert EngineeringSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. Philip Services Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Malvilen Cook v. St. Genevive Health Care Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Marlon Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Michael Chaisson v. Philip Services CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API