Legal Opinion
Zemunski v. Kenney
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided February 3, 1992No. CV90-L-195PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
URBOM, Senior District Judge.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is before me, the magistrate judge having recommended its denial and the petitioner having objected to that recommendation both through counsel and personally. My conclusion, after studying each, is that the petition must be denied.
The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation of May 23, 1991, is meticulous and exhaustive. It contains a careful recitation of the applicable cases, the hairline distinctions drawn in those cases and thoughtfully concludes that there was no denial of a constitutional…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Lawrence Douglas Todd, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Billy Ray LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michael Zemunski v. Michael L. KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005