Legal Opinion
Wortendyke v. Borg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 28, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to grant an easement of ingress and egress to the petitioners, the petitioners, Carl V. Wortendyke, Martin C. Wortendyke and Peter Wortendyke, a partnership doing business as Wortendyke Brothers, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), dated November 10, 1986, as dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The petitioners own a parcel of land in the Town of Orange-town which is improved by a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Washington Post Co. v. New York State Insurance DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of New York v. GarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- State v. Westchester Joint Water WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003