Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America v. Clum
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee leans heavily, and, under Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487, properly, on two doctrines of the Pennsylvania courts. The first is “good faith” as the touchstone for answers in applications for life insurance. All the cases cited in either brief are collected in 20 Vale Pennsylvania Digest, sub nomine Insurance, <§=’256(2), p. 429. The second is the narrow scope of the court’s power to enter judgments non obstante veredicto, 22 Vale Pennsylvania Digest, sub nomine Judgment, <®=,199(3), p. 325. The emphasis…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. MarottaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Weintrob v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore ApuzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- McSweeney v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Constance A. Stopper v. The Manhattan Life Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- United States v. BarboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.