Sutton v. Bower & Perkins
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Kossuth District Court.— Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The defendants, Bower & Perkins, were parties to- a written contract with -one J. L. Sutton. The latter assigned his interest in the contract to L. E. Sutton, who brought suit upon it against Bower & Perkins before a justice of the' peace of Kossuth county. On the return day ¡the defendants .entered an appearance to the action, and, trial being had, judgment was rendered against them. Thereupon, on .same day, defendants undertook to perfect an appeal to the-district court, and filed a bond for that purpose. The bond was -in due form, and sufficient in all respects, except that it named J. L.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lovitt v. Wellington & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Minton ex rel. Smith v. OziasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Long v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- Mitchell v. GoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Brock v. ManattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodard v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of Fairfield v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- McCord v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Buttolph v. Town of PostvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Dickinson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926