Humphreys v. Logan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 60, Oct. T., 1913, by petitioner, from order of O. P. Jefferson Co., April T., 1910, No. IBIS, discharging petitioner’s rule to open judgment in case of Robert Humphreys v. Andrew Logan and Eosa S. Logan. Eule to open judgment. Before Eeed, P. J. The facts appear by he opinion of the Supreme Court. The court discharged the rule. Petitioners appealed. Error assigned, among others, was in discharging rule.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from am order discharging a rule to open a confessed judgment entered against a married woman on the allegation that the petitioner was surety for her husband. The judgment had been-of record twenty-two years and had been four times revived before the petition for a rale to open was presented. On the hearing it was found that the money borrowed of the plaintiff was used by the husband and wife for the improvement of their real estate, the title to which they held by entireties, upon a rehearing the court saw no sufficient reason to change this finding. The judgment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Abell v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaufman v. LehmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Le Goullon v. Green, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1930