Taylor v. Tompkins
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM WILSON. From the Chancery Court at Lebanon, before Henry Cooper, J. cited 1 Story’s Eq., §§ 66, 67, 74, 455, 458, and n. 1, 459, 462, 3, 468, 680, 690; Pearl v. Corporation of Nashville, 10 Yer., 179. cited 1 Story’s Eq. Jut., 320, 323, 324, 458 a, 825, 9 a, 462; 10 Ter., 184; Smiley v. Bell, M. & Y., 378; MeLin v. McNamara, 2 Dev. & Bat.
Read the full summary
FROM WILSON. From the Chancery Court at Lebanon, before Henry Cooper, J. cited 1 Story’s Eq., §§ 66, 67, 74, 455, 458, and n. 1, 459, 462, 3, 468, 680, 690; Pearl v. Corporation of Nashville, 10 Yer., 179. cited 1 Story’s Eq. Jut., 320, 323, 324, 458 a, 825, 9 a, 462; 10 Ter., 184; Smiley v. Bell, M. & Y., 378; MeLin v. McNamara, 2 Dev. & Bat. Eq., 82; Hough v. Martin, Id., 379. cited, in addition, Hay v. Marshall, 3 Head, 623; 1 Story, §§ 689, 691; Bussell v. Clark’s ex’rs, 7 Cranch, 69; Denny v. Gilman, 26 Maine, 149; Whiteside v. Lafferty, 9 Hum., 30; Overton v. Searcy, Cooke, 36, 39,…
1Opinion of the Court
EeeemaN, J.,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.
These cases were bills and amended bills, filed in the Chancery Court of Wilson county, alleging, substantially, that in 1862, complainants were induced, by the representations of Edward Tompkins, of whom defendant was executrix, to deposit with said Edward Tompkins a large amount of dry goods and other articles, of the value specified in each of the bills in these causes; that Tompkins sold said goods, some on time, taking notes for the same to himself, some for cash; that he sold many of the goods at above fifty per cent, on cost; that he sold…
2Cited by5 opinions
- San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Greene County Union Bank v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- Chaffee v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Greene County Union Bank v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- Hewgley v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962