Heller v. Levine
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Charlene Heller, in a mortgage foreclosure action. From a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, and from the denial of the defendant’s motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict the defendant appeals.
Although the defendant sets forth eight “questions presented for review” we believe that there are primarily three ques tions that this Court is called upon to consider :
1. Were the note, mortgage, and escrow instructions “delivered” and properly admitted in evidence?
2. Is the evidence sufficient to show…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re McDonnell's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Murphey v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1909
- Apolito v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- First National Bank v. National Grain CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Molk v. MicklewrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Andreola v. Arizona BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. National Equity Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Wixom v. InghamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- United States v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- David Kester v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.