Atkins v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
I
This is not the usual proceeding on appeal in which we must determine if the findings of fact and conclusions of law of an administrative board are supported by competent evidence. Indeed, after the trial court found and concluded that the Board’s findings and conclusions were supported by competent, material and substantial evidence, the trial court determined, as a matter of law, that certain uses and structures, described in the Board’s Order, “were not being conducted on the effective date of the Ordinance and therefore not lawful non-conforming uses nor otherwise lawful in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Application of Rea Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Jackson v. Pottstown Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- County Commissioners of Carroll County v. ZentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, Coastal Resources Commission DivisionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Godfrey v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Godfrey v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Union CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.