Legal Opinion
In re Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, (1) the petitioner, Martin G.S., appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated September 28, 2000, as appointed the cross petitioners as the personal needs guardians of Rose S., and (2) the cross petitioners, Ellen J.S. and Stephanie S.W., cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of the same order and judgment which, among other things, determined that a health care proxy executed by Rose S. on June 22, 1999, was valid.
Or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Feiden v. FeidenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Smith v. ComasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Estate of ObermeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hubbard v. GatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of WaldronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kaminester v. FoldesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Buckley v. Ritchie Knop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Borenstein v. SimonsonNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Jordan v. ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lawrence v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.