Legal Opinion

In re Abrahams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to discipline an attorney for professional misconduct.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York presented two charges against respondent, which were referred to a referee, who has filed his report. Both charges involved the preferment of criminal charges by the respondent for the purpose of influencing the decision of civil cases in which either the respondent or his client was interested. The facts as to the *596first charge were, that the respondent as plaintiff had instituted an action against one Carl Spilka, which case had been tried and verdict rendered in'favor of the respondent and against Spilka; that Spilka had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re GelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. In re AbrahamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API