Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan District Court. — Hon. Franklin C. Platt, Judge. Action at law to recover' damages for the nondelivery of a telegram. The trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1, and he, plaintiff, appeals. —

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, J. —

The petition is in two counts. In the first plaintiff asks damages for pain and anguish resulting from the failure of defendant to deliver a telegram sent by his plaintiff’s son from Wausa, Neb., announcing the death of the son’s wife; and, in the second, for pain and anguish suffered by the son resulting from the nondelivery of the message to plaintiff, the said claim having been assigned to plaintiff. It was alleged in each count that defendant, when it received the message, was informed that it related to the death of the son’s wife. The message read as follows: “To James…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mentzer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. CoffinTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LuckTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cowan v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Kennon v. W. U. Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albrook v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Maley v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API