Legal Opinion

Belcher v. Hale

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 15, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00764Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TORRENCE BELCHER, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-764-DRL-AZ TERRI HALE, SARA MCCORMICK, DAWN BUS, RON NEAL, and MARK NEWKIRK, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Torrence Belcher, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a fourth amended complaint alleging he was entitled to State pay even though he was not working. ECF 16. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. Perry L. Scott, Sr., Michelle M. Scott, Phillip H. Scott, Jr. v. Rodney L. Edinburg and Village of Glenwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Joseph Detomaso v. Kenneth McGinnis Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Louis Wozniak v. Ilesanmi AdesidaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API