Legal Opinion

Forbes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 2013No. 4D11-4617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The State concedes that the trial court erred by failing to enter a written order revoking Defendant’s probation. Recent decisions of this court support that concession. See Oertel v. State, 82 So.3d 152, 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (“[Ajlthough the trial court orally pronounced the violation of probation, it did not enter a written order.”); King v. State, 46 So.3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“If a trial court revokes a defendant’s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.”). The State also concedes that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Oertel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Ciccia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chambers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API