Long v. State

HALL, Judge.

Victoria Long contends the trial court erred in denying her motions for judgment of acquittal and a new trial on charges of racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, living from earnings of prostitution, and keeping a house of ill fame. She contends the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions.1 We find no merit in her contentions and sustain her convictions on racketeering, conspiracy, and living off earnings. We reverse, however, Long’s conviction for keeping a house of ill fame.

As we stated in Wolfe v. State, 576 So.2d 915 (Fla.2d DCA, 1991), our supreme…