Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Wkit of Error to the Circuit Court of Fayette. This action is upon two twenty dollar notes, against the defendant, as a partner of the Real Estate Bank of Caledonia, Mississippi. It was commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and was carried to the Circuit Court by appeal.

Read the full summary

Wkit of Error to the Circuit Court of Fayette. This action is upon two twenty dollar notes, against the defendant, as a partner of the Real Estate Bank of Caledonia, Mississippi. It was commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and was carried to the Circuit Court by appeal. At the trial it appeared that the notes were signed by certain persons as the President and Cashier of the Company and by them the promise was to pay the sum of money to John Elliott, or bearer, on demand, at their banking house. Elliott was a partner in the concern when the notes were issued, and was merely the nominal…

1Opinion of the CourtGoldthwaite, J.

If the rules of the common law could be applied to the circumstances of this suit, it would not be questioned that any bona fide holder of the notes could maintain an action in his own name as the bearer; and such we presume is the law of the State, where these notes were made and first put in circulation. But it seems to be conceded on all sides, that so far as the remedy is concerned, it must be sought according to the law of the State where the suit is instituted, and here the holder is placed in a very peculiar position. If he attempts to sue in his own name, as the bearer of the notes,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lacy v. Le BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API