Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The grounds upon which the petitioner claims that he is entitled to the return of his automobile are two:

First; that the portion of the statute providing for the forfeiture of a conveyance used in the transportation of liquor, upon the conviction of the user of said conveyance, applies to public and private carriers only and not to individuals;

Second; that said portion of the statute is in violation of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the *171State of Delaware, in that, when invoked, it amounts to a taking of property…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re Trust Created by Will of EngerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. General Electric Co. v. KleinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  4. Scarborough v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  5. State v. Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API