Legal Opinion

In re Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 31, 2017No. 2016-B-2278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*837ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

2Per curiam

| iThis disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Edward Hebert, II, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently suspended from practice.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current matter, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1997. He has been ineligible to practice law since 2006, based on his failure to comply with the mandatory continuing legal education…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re BanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. In re HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. In re HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Louisiana v. Nathan Glenn Pettit, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API