Hamaker v. Patrick
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an action at law. Plaintiff’s petition set forth two causes of action. There was a trial to a jury with verdict and judgment for plaintiff.
At the close of the evidence, the bill of exceptions discloses that the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant “for each and all of the following reasons,” which included the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. However, the cause was duly argued to the jury, a verdict returned for the plaintiff, and a judgment entered thereon. Within the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Hansen v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnson v. SongsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Gretna State Bank v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Losure v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamaker v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Elfers v. Schuff & Sons Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- LeBron Electrical Works, Inc. v. PizingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937