Legal Opinion

Hamaker v. Patrick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1932No. 27986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action at law. Plaintiff’s petition set forth two causes of action. There was a trial to a jury with verdict and judgment for plaintiff.

At the close of the evidence, the bill of exceptions discloses that the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant “for each and all of the following reasons,” which included the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant. However, the cause was duly argued to the jury, a verdict returned for the plaintiff, and a judgment entered thereon. Within the time…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' National Bank v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hansen v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Johnson v. SongsterNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gretna State Bank v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Losure v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamaker v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Elfers v. Schuff & Sons Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. LeBron Electrical Works, Inc. v. PizingerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API