Parmele & Baker v. Brashear
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE OOXJRT OP THE FIFTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OP ST. MARY, JUDGE LEWIS, THEN OF THE DISTRICT, PRESIDING. This is an ■ action against the surety in a curator’s bond. The plaintiffs allege that in December, 1834, they obtained a judgment against the curator of the estafe of William’S. Barr, deceased, for three hundred and sixty-seven dollars, with interest.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE OOXJRT OP THE FIFTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OP ST. MARY, JUDGE LEWIS, THEN OF THE DISTRICT, PRESIDING. This is an ■ action against the surety in a curator’s bond. The plaintiffs allege that in December, 1834, they obtained a judgment against the curator of the estafe of William’S. Barr, deceased, for three hundred and sixty-seven dollars, with interest. That on the 30th of June, of (hat year, Robert B. Brashear, obtained a prolongation of the curator-ship of said Barr’s estate, with W. Brashear as his surety. They further urge that the condition of the bond is broken, and the…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This case was before us at a former term, on an exception which was sustained by the District Court, and which this court overruled, and remanded the case for trial on the’ merits. See 11 Louisiana Reports, 329.
There was judgment on the second trial for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have again appealed.
The defendant’s principal in the bond, curator of the estate of William S. Barr, deceased, at the end of the first year of his curatorship, presented an account of his administration, in which he placed the plaintiffs as creditors, for the sum of three hundred and sixty dollars and fifty…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. BrashearSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Ford v. KittredgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
- Hebert v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1870
- Succession of Reilly v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915