Legal Opinion

Crean v. Hourigan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard iu that court on appeal from the Circuit. Court of Alexander county; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

That which purported to be the nuncupative will of Margaret Hourigan, deceased, and to bequeath her property to her brother, Maurice Crean, was admitted to probate in the,county court of Alexander county. Michael Hourigan, husband of the deceased, appealed to the circuit court from the order admitting said will to probate. In the latter court a jury was waived and the issue submitted to the court, and the court found that the said alleged nuncupative will was not a valid will, and adjudged that it should not be admitted to probate. From the judgment so rendered Crean appealed to the Appellate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis National Stock Yards v. Wiggins Ferry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Tibballs v. LibbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waukegan Park District v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Allman v. LumsdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bolton v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bredhoff v. LepmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Chicago City Ry. Co. v. BensonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API