Legal Opinion
STATE, DOT AND DEVELOPMENT v. Keating
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1989No. 88-CA-1940, 88-CA-1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 So.2d 247 (1989)
STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT
v.
Thomas C. KEATING, et al.
Nos. 88-CA-1940, 88-CA-1941.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
March 14, 1989.
Frederick J. Fuselier, Office of Gen. Counsel, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.
Before SCHOTT, C.J., and KLEES and WILLIAMS, JJ.
WILLIAMS, Judge.
In these consolidated expropriation suits, the narrow issue to be resolved on appeal is whether the expropriating authority, the State of Louisiana through the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD), can be assessed with jury costs when…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Dept. of Highways v. Trippeer Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT v. WinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. Boyce Gin Co-Op., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. v. Van WilletLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. C. Schexnayder, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Twenty-First Judicial District Court v. State ex rel. GusteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Carter v. HON. JUDGES, DIV. AE, G, & ISupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Alexander v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- TWENTY-FIRST JUD. DIST. COURT v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990