State v. Blair
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Respondent appeals from an order determining that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10 and committing him to a secure treatment facility. Contrary to respondent’s contention, we conclude that petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence at the dispositional hearing that he is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement (see § 10.03 [e]; § 10.07 [f]). Supreme Court, as the trier of fact, was “in the best position to evaluate the weight and credibility of the conflicting psychiatric testimony presented” (Matter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CampanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- State v. Timothy JJ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- State v. Richard VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Anderson v. House of Good Samaritan HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Zilliox v. Western New York Snowmobile Club of Boston, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Kenneth BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State v. GoodingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sample v. YokelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State v. HarlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.