Legal Opinion

Matthew Williams v. Dana Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1971No. 20816_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We consider an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action filed in propria persona by an employee against his employer under § 301 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), for violation of a collective bargaining agreement. Appellant was discharged from his job for absenteeism under criteria embodied in supplementary language added to the contract after initial ratification. He alleges that this contract language was adopted in violation of the UAW Constitution, art. 19, § 3, which requires approval by the affected local union of such changes in a collective bargaining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Norman Broniman v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Little v. BarremeSupreme Court of the United States · 1804

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sedlarik v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1971
  2. Thomas v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API