Legal Opinion
Longs v. Wyeth
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 20, 2009No. Case No.: 1:03 CV 2042PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff Ramona Longs (“Plaintiff’ or “Longs”) brings the above-captioned lawsuit as executor of the estate of decedent Mary Buchanan (“Buchanan”), alleging product liability claims regarding the diet pill Redux against Defendants Wyeth, et al. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Wyeth”). Now pending before the court are Plaintiffs Motion to Vacate Order and Judgment (ECF No. 151) and Plaintiffs Motion to Alter Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 152). For the reasons discussed below, both Motions are denied.
I. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wimbush Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Wimbush Ex Rel. Estate of Buchanan v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010