Legal Opinion

United States v. Troy

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 3, 2008No. CR-07-64-MPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.

Just before trial on the charge of assaulting two federal officers, David Wong Troy, though represented by counsel, acted pro se in raising a number of claims of legal error. The Court addresses and denies each contention.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

After a one day jury trial, David Wong Troy was convicted of knowingly and forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, and interfering with a United States Customs and Border Protection Officer, while she was engaged in her official duties, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a). 1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. GatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API