John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rao, Chief Judge:
Imported through the port of Philadelphia was a shipment, described on the commercial invoice accompanying the entry papers as ‘TOO only Agricultural Weed Burners,” which the collector classified for customs duty purposes as articles or wares, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of steel, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, at 19 per centum ad valorem.
A timely protest has been filed pursuant to section…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Van Bourgondien Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by1 opinion
- Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966