Legal Opinion

John H. Faunce Phila., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1965No. 69541; protest 62/9759 (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

Imported through the port of Philadelphia was a shipment, described on the commercial invoice accompanying the entry papers as ‘TOO only Agricultural Weed Burners,” which the collector classified for customs duty purposes as articles or wares, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of steel, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, at 19 per centum ad valorem.

A timely protest has been filed pursuant to section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BokerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Van Bourgondien Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API