Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 24, 1999No. 98-3344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellants appeal the deficiency judgment entered against them. The ap-pellee (“FDIC”) cross-appeals the deficiency amount based on the court’s failure to include the amount of unpaid ad valorem taxes in its deficiency calculation. We affirm in all respects, except we reverse and remand for a recalculation of the deficiency amount.

The FDIC asserts the trial court erred in its determination of the deficiency amount by failing to reduce the fair market value of the property by the amount of unpaid ad valorem taxes. In addition, the FDIC argues that the trial court could not equitably reduce…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chidnese v. McCollemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Chidnese v. McCollemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DENISE L. MARTINEC v. EARLY BIRD INTERNATIONAL, INC. and LARRY MARTINECDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API