Legal Opinion

Chemical Co. v. . Pegram

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought by the Chemical Company of Canton against their agent, T. H. Pegram, Jr., to recover an alleged balance due by him for fertilizers sold, amounting to $4,140, and against L. W. Pegram and T. H. Pegram, Sr., to recover the penalty ($3,000) of a bond executed by them as sureties for Pegram, Jr.

Upon the hearing of the report and exceptions filed by plaintiff (620) and defendants, the court overruled plaintiff's exceptions and sustained defendants' exceptions, and adjudged that the plaintiff recover of the defendant T. H. Pegram, Jr., the sum of $3,049.33, with interest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sutton v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Harper v. . Dail Bro.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. National Bank of Asheville v. SumnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Forbes v. . SheppardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. Foster v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nolte v. NolteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Rea Construction Co. v. Ervin Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API