Legal Opinion

Lansing v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Monroe; Kinne, J. Case by Edith Lansing, by next friend, against the Michigan Central Railroad Company, for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In November, 1899, plaintiff was injured in a railroad accident upon defendant’s railroad. To recover damages for said injury, she sued defendant in the Monroe circuit court. No next friend was appointed. Her attorneys were Look & Humphrey. Negotiations were had between Mr. Pond, acting for the defendant, and Mr. Look, acting for plaintiff, looking to a settlement of the controversy. Mr. Look telegraphed plaintiff to come to Detroit, and she did so. A settlement was agreed upon. The plaintiff signed and caused to be delivered to defendant the following paper:

“May 25, 1900.
“The Michigan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armitage v. WidoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Dunton v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Lewless v. Detroit, Grand Hayen & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Osburn v. FarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. CarilloArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stoll v. HawksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Milligan v. S. W. Straus & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API