Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Aerial Farm Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 10, 1987No. C5-86-1710PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant sued respondent for breach of contract, trespass, and for negligently spraying herbicides on his Siberian elm windbreak. In Grossman v. Aerial Farms, 384 N.W.2d 488 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (“Grossman /”) this court held appellant’s cause of action for negligent spraying of herbicides was barred by a two year statute of limitations. Following that appeal, *677respondents moved for summary judgment on appellant’s trespass claim. After granting appellant’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, the trial court granted respondents’ motion which, coupled with the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Grossman v. Aerial Farm Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ford v. Emerson Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API