Nopper v. Nopper
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKane, J.
Kane, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). Although I agree that disbursements were erroneously assessed against the defendant, I would additionally conclude that the entire judgment should be reversed. Plaintiffs action is one in contract for the alleged breach of a separation agreement. While such agreements are subject to ordinary principles of construction and interpretation (cf. Tamas v Tamas, 47 AD2d 686; Matter of Baker v Baker, 33 AD2d 812), the quoted language of the instant contract makes it unambiguously plain that its terms were not to survive a subsequent divorce.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Stoddard v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Tamas v. TamasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975