Legal Opinion

MV Bull Calf

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided June 19, 1946No. 4453PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULEN, District Judge.

The United States as libelant initiated this proceeding in rem against The MV Bull Calf, a motor tug boat, and in personam against Canal Barge Company, Inc., to collect $10,000 damages, resulting from the sinking of the CGR 1800, a motor launch. The Barge Company excepts to the libel on the grounds (1) it fails to state a cause of action and (2) it is not verified.

The libel is filed on behalf of the United States, the owner of the CGR 1800, its officers and crew. . It is stated that Julius L. Lage is the owner of the CGR 1800, but it was operated by the U. S. Coast Guard…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Propeller Monticello v. MollisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. The Nichiyo MaruCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. 935 CASES MORE OR LESS, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Jersey CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  5. United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austerberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. Cia. Naviera Continental, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. Smith v. CowenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Crader v. JamisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Dresser Industries, Inc. v. LaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API