Legal Opinion

People v. De Mas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1912No. Gen. No. 17,187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

The plaintiff in error was arrested upon a capias issued upon an information sworn to by Lena Burkett, charging him with the crime of pandering. A jury trial was waived and trial had by the court, which found De Mas guilty, and he was sentenced.

It is claimed that the information is-insufficient in that (1) it nowhere alleges that Lena Burkett is a “female person(2) it is not alleged that she was induced to remain therein “as such inmate(3) the information begins by saying that Lena Burkett comes “in his own proper person.”

The first two objections go merely to the form of the information and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PizziAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowe's of Raleigh, Inc. v. WorldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. People v. MansfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API