Legal Opinion

Tower Building Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 25, 1946No. Docket No. 6397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Black, Judge:

In this proceeding we are asked to determine petitioner’s basis for depreciation. In this broad respect the issue is the same as was involved in Claridge Apartments Co. v. Commissioner, 323 U. S. 141; Alcazar Hotel, Inc., 1 T. C. 872; appeal dismissed on motion of the parties, C. C. A., 6th Cir., and Motor Mart Trust, 4 T. C. 931; on appeal, C. C. A., 1st Cir. We start with section 14 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code, which is as follows:(a) Basis foe Depreciation. — The basis upon which exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence are to be allowed in respect of any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claridge Apartments Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Alcazar Hotel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  3. Motor Mart Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colonial Sav. Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Colonial Sav. Asso. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API