Legal Opinion

New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Fancher

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 13, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In Graves v. Fancher et al., 81 N.J. Eq. 407; affirmed,Ibid. 517, a bill to quiet title, decided in 1912, the title to the land involved in this suit — Wawayanda lake, in Sussex county — was held to be in the complainant in fee, and it was accordingly decreed that the defendants "have no title, interest in or encumbrance upon the same or any part thereof," and as against the defendants that "the title of the complainant, in and to the same, and every part thereof, is hereby determined, fixed and settled and declared to be good." The land involved is described as:

"All the lands lying on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayor of Paterson v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1893
  2. Seymour & Sage v. LewisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1861
  3. Graves v. FancherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Silk Dyeing Co. v. GrobartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API