Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Miller
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 27, 2012No. 11-2506PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Andrew Miller was charged with one count of distributing, one count of receiving, and three counts of possessing child pornography. At trial, Miller testified that he had no interest in viewing child pornography, and he did not “seek out images of naked children.” Finding that Miller’s testimony opened the door to evidence of his intent, knowledge, and lack of mistake, the district court allowed the government to question him about allegations of sexual misconduct made by his six-year-old granddaughter and his teenage stepdaughter. The court prohibited the government…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Helen Mihailovich v. Gary Laatsch and Law Office of Pavalon, Gifford, Laatsch & MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ZahurskyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Keefer JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Christopher SealsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- William Viramontes v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Christopher EadsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Steven LatinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Christopher Parish v. City of ElkhaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.