Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Rhodes & Anderson, D.C., P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 26, 2008No. 2D07-3109PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANADY, Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s decision affirming final summary judgments entered in county court personal injury protection (PIP) actions in favor of the respondent, which is a provider of chiropractic care. For the reasons expressed below, we grant the petition and quash the circuit court’s order.

I. Background

In three separate county court cases, the respondent filed actions against State Farm for PIP benefits. In each of the cases, the respondent had provided treatment to State Farm’s insureds for injuries…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Progressive Exp. v. McGRATH CHIROPRACTICDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. STATE FARM FLORIDA INS. CO. v. LorenzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Derius v. Allstate Indem. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Santa Fe Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Chiropractic v. United Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. United Auto. Ins. Co. v. BermudezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Hollywood Injury Rehab CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Central Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API