Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Alford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1943No. 36893PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

A judgment ordering the return of three pin-ball machines allegedly owned by him, and granting injunctive relief, is prayed for by plaintiff, Albert E. Fernandez, in this action instituted against Steve Alford and John E. DeArmond, Superintendent and Captain, respectively, of the Department of State Police.

The material allegations of his petition may be summarized as follows:

In the operation of a business known as the Central Coin Machine Company, plaintiff owns certain mechanical devices called pin-ball machines and places them in various establishments in the City of New…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. WalmsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Union Ice & Coal Co. v. Town of RustonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. City of Shreveport v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  5. City of New Orleans v. SchickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State MuseumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Francis v. MorialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API