State v. Fuller
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, J.:
Defendant Harry Jene Fuller appeals his conviction for sale of marijuana (K.S.A. 65-4127b[b][3]) on the grounds that (1) the trial court erred by admitting the results of marijuana identification tests without requiring sufficient foundation and (2) the trial court erred in refusing to give a cautionary instruction regarding the testimony of a paid confidential informant. We reverse and remand on both issues.
The defendant was convicted of selling marijuana to a confidential informant for the Salina Police Department. S.B. testified that he called Detective Michael Marshall, his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Joe Garcia, Guillermo Sandoval, and Mario SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Bobby Dean Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. NovotnySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- State v. WaldrupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.