Legal Opinion

State v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 30, 1990No. 64,594PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.:

Defendant Harry Jene Fuller appeals his conviction for sale of marijuana (K.S.A. 65-4127b[b][3]) on the grounds that (1) the trial court erred by admitting the results of marijuana identification tests without requiring sufficient foundation and (2) the trial court erred in refusing to give a cautionary instruction regarding the testimony of a paid confidential informant. We reverse and remand on both issues.

The defendant was convicted of selling marijuana to a confidential informant for the Salina Police Department. S.B. testified that he called Detective Michael Marshall, his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. Joe Garcia, Guillermo Sandoval, and Mario SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. State v. LowrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  4. Bobby Dean Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. NovotnySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. WaldrupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API