Legal Opinion
Landau v. Eisenberg
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 1, 2019No. 17-3963PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Per curiam
In June 2005, two groups from the Bobov Hasidic Jewish community in Brooklyn, New York, agreed to arbitrate certain disputes before a rabbinical tribunal. Petitioners-appellees asserted that "Bobov" was "a trademark within the meaning of section 45 of the Lanham Act ... because for decades, the word 'Bobov' has been used in commerce to distinguish the goods and services of the Bobov community." Central to the dispute was whether the respondents "had the right to use the name and mark BOBOV for its new Hasidic community." The arbitration agreement provided that a panel consisting of five…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Landy Michaels Realty Corp. v. Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- National Football League Management Council v. National Football League Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Peterson v. Bank MarkaziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Tereshchenko v. KarimiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Molecular Dynamics, Ltd. v. Spectrum Dynamics Med. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers v. Alaris Health at Hamilton ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Alam v. HillerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.